|
by John Fitzpatrick
Brazil´s Senators showed their contempt for the
people who elected them by spitting in their faces when they absolved the
chairman, Renan Calheiros, of unparliamentarily procedure on September 12. The
entire 81-member Senate turned up and voted by 40 votes to 35, with six
abstentions, not to accept the recommendation of its own ethics committee and
force Calheiros to stand down over allegations that his personal expenses had
been paid by a lobbyist for a construction company. This vote flew in the face
of credible evidence that Calheiros had not only used the lobbyist but had
secretly acquired control of two radio stations and had also intervened to help
a brewer gain tax benefits. The 40 Senators who voted for Calheiros must be the
only people in the whole country who accept his unconvincing explanations and
condone the unscrupulous methods he has used to cling onto power. Parallels have
been drawn with the 40 Senators and the 40 Thieves, with President Luiz Inacio
Lula da Silva in the role of Ali Baba. This is a fair comparison, confirmed by
the abstentions of PT Senators who saved Calheiros.
Calheiros´ triumph could be short-lived as he
still faces at least two other charges from the ethics committee over his shady
business activities. It is difficult to see him holding on much further and the
likeliest outcome is that he will stand down, maintain his position as a Senator
and rely on a team of lawyers to fend off any attempts to bring him to court.
The idea that he will be punished in the form of a jail sentence, a hefty fine
and/or the confiscation of his gains is inconceivable in a country like Brazil
where politicians are coated in Teflon. A deal will be done, he will maintain a
low profile for a while then bounce back, as so many of his colleagues have
done. Fernando Collor, Antonio Palocci, the late Antonio Carlos Magalhães and
Jader Barbalho are examples. In fact, one of Calheiros´ main advisers is
Barbalho, ex-chairman of the Senate, who stood down in 2001 when faced with
allegations that he had illegally amassed R$35 million (around US17.5 million)
during his political career. By standing down, rather than being forced out,
Calheiros will be able to maintain his rights and stand again as a candidate for
election.
PT Loses its Ideals
We will probably never know all of those who voted for Calheiros because
the vote was taken in secrecy but there is no doubt that Lula´s PT tipped the
balance in favor of Calheiros who is from the PMDB party, the main ally of
Lula´s government. This was another example of how the PT has forgotten its
ideals and is now just another amorphous political grouping which is prepared to
make a deal with any other party or group in order to share political power.
Calheiros is an all too familiar figure – a man of modest background from the
Northeast who has built up a personal fortune during his political life and used
his influence in Brasilia to benefit himself, his family and friends. He showed
his true face when he made veiled threats against two other Senators by name,
letting them know that he could leak information about them. He also called for
a congressional inquiry to be opened against the company that owns Veja
magazine, which broke the scandal in May, and accused it of acting illegally in
a business deal.
The Veja report showed that Calheiros, a married man, had been paying an
allowance to a journalist with whom he had had a child, through the lobbyist.
The amount was out of proportion to his salary as a Senator and Calheiros
claimed he had paid from the sale of cattle. This explanation fooled no one and
inquiries showed that many of the bills he presented to back up his claim were
phony and inflated. His inability to clear his name led to the opening of a
number of inquiries, both within the Senate and by the police.
Like Barbalho, Jose Sarney and ACM, Calheiros is exactly the kind of figure
the PT has always said it opposed and blamed for the social inequalities in
Brazil, particularly the Northeast where Lula was born. In practice, Lula has
been happy to sit down and do business with them. Ironically, this affair would
never have reached this stage had it not been for a group of former PT members,
now with the PSOL party, who Lula threw out of the PT because they had refused
to vote with his government on certain issues. The two main opposition parties –
the PSDB and DEM (ex-PFL) – let the PSOL set the pace and entered the fray too
late. There is a widely held view that many Senators did not want to upset the
status quo as they too have their secrets which they do not want appearing in
the press.
The PSDB and DEM now say they will not cooperate with the government while
Calheiros remains in charge. Lula will have to take this threat seriously
because the Senate has to approve various measures to get the budget ready. The
most important is the extension of the CPMF tax on financial transactions which
bring the government around RS$ 40 billion in revenues. When this tax was
introduced 10 years ago it was supposed to be a temporary measure but
governments of all stripes have come to rely on it. Reports say that the
government is working behind the scenes to break this logjam and come up with a
solution which will basically let Calheiros off the hook, appoint the
vice-chairman who is from the PT as the new Senate leader, and allow the
opposition to claim a victory.
As for the Brazilian people whose faces have been spat on, do they care? It
seems not. There have been a few scattered protests, usually involving students,
but the majority of people are not interested or know nothing about the affair.
A pathetic attempt was made by a group of São Paulo socialites and so-called
celebrities to form a protest group under the uninspiring name of “Cansei” (“Fed
Up”) but its “rallies” were an embarrassing failure. The organized left-wing
groups, like the MST landless peasant movement, and the trade unions, which
could put tens of thousands of demonstrators on the streets, are only interested
in their own causes and not democracy. For example, the postal workers have
started a strike aimed at boosting their wages by almost 100% and hiring tens of
thousands of extra staff.
© John Fitzpatrick 2007 |