|
by John Fitzpatrick
Brazil been a full democracy for over 20 years
now and there is no threat of any return to military rule. However, the blatant
disdain for the law and contempt for the public shown by some leading
politicians could pose a threat to democracy if it is not checked.
Unfortunately, the Brazilian people and their political parties, trade unions,
professional bodies and churches are standing by and allowing corrupt
politicians to walk all over them. There are no signs that people are prepared
to take to the streets to get rid of the worst culprits. These include
the Senate chairman, Renan Calheiros, whose desperate attempts to cling to
office are producing so many fresh scandals that you could be forgiven for
thinking that there is no such creature as an honest politician in Brazil.
It is not often that I agree with the people who write letters to the
Estado de S. Paulo newspaper. They are overwhelmingly middle-class
whingers, constantly moaning about President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and his
government, the MST landless peasant movement, Greenpeace, the International
Monetary Fund, George Bush, Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and Bolivia´s Evo Morales,
amongst others.
I was, therefore, astonished to find the following
letter in the July 9 edition. I doubt if any foreigner would have had the nerve
to write this letter and the correspondent is to be congratulated for his
honesty.
This is a free translation: “When I saw the photo of thousands of
Colombians who took to the streets to protest against guerrillas who have been
responsible for the deaths of a number of kidnap victims, I felt ashamed. The
Colombian example is normal in other Latin American countries and I feel ashamed
because we Brazilians only know how to take to the streets to dance at Carnival
time and welcome back football teams. If a protest was to be arranged against
all the filth and corruption that rules our politics, we would not be able to
get more than a half a dozen oddballs together. We are a country of cowards and
punchbags ready to accept anything. We only have the courage to protest through
newspapers, as I am doing, making life easy for demagogues like Lula. As long as
we remain like this, we will continue to be at the mercy of the Renans, Malufs,
Jaderes, Sarneys, Lulas, ACMs and others like them.”
The sad truth is that people are so shell shocked by the scandals involving
politicians that they do not care any more. Since the “bribes for votes”
scandal, known as the mensalão, broke in June 2005, we have experienced
scores of similar events. I will not list them as there are simply too many but
they have involved politicians from virtually every party and destroyed any idea
that Lula´s Workers Party (PT) was more ethically-minded than the other parties
which emerged or re-emerged from the days of the military. A number of senior
government ministers and PT leaders have lost their positions and it is almost
unbelievable that Lula not only remained unscathed but was re-elected by such a
wide margin.
Although people like Jose Dirceu, Lula´s former chief of staff, Antonio
Palocci, the ex-finance minister, and the former PTB leader, Roberto Jefferson,
lost their positions, not a single politician has been convicted and punished.
Dirceu and Jefferson lost their seats and some political rights for eight
years but they are still active and campaigns are underway to overturn the
decisions. The current scandal concerns allegations that Calheiros has amassed a
personal fortune by doing favors for companies in return for kickbacks. The case
against him is rock solid, backed by taped telephone conversations, statements
by witnesses and documents. His defense has been unconvincing and contradictory
and no-one believes a word he says. However, despite this evidence, Renan´s
colleagues – including none other than Lula – have been reluctant to tell him to
renounce his office while an investigation gets underway. It is only now, more
than a month into the scandal, that a significant number of Senators are
starting to speak out. Even then, few have criticized the blatant way Calheiros
has abused his powers to try and shelf the issue by making comments on the case
in his position as Senate chairman and filling the so-called ethics committee
with his buddies.
Ironically, the only politicians who have acted with any concern for the
electorate – and echoed the views of the middle-class Estado de S. Paulo
correspondents - have been the members of the extreme-left PSOL. These were
kicked out of the PT in the first year of Lula´s government for not supporting
his administration. If they had not insisted in a Congressional investigation,
Calheiros would still be sitting pretty.
It is inconceivable that Calheiros can retain power, particularly as his
inept attempts to dodge the issue have merely caused him more problems. A
shameful deal will be done which will remove him from his position but with his
gains, cushy lifestyle and political rights intact. He will continue to glide
through the corridors of power and will feel no shame. He will be given an
abraço by Lula the next time they meet and his colleagues will
commiserate with him on his bad luck on being caught out. Life in Brasilia will
return to normal and the politicians will continue to look after themselves and
their henchmen first and the electorate last.
It is easy to condemn these unprincipled politicians but, as the newspaper
correspondent pointed, the electorate is allowing them to get away with it. When
George Bush came to São Paulo in March, between 6,000 and 10,000 people
demonstrated against him, depending on whose figures you believe. When the Pope
visited the city in May, an estimated two million attended the mass he
celebrated. A month later, an estimated 3.5 million people took part in the São
Paulo gay pride day. It seems that Brazilians are prepared to take to the
streets to bash Bush, celebrate their faith and show their sexual tolerance yet
they are not prepared to do so to stand up for their political rights.
© John Fitzpatrick 2007
|